Poking about on the Departmental Reports page on the "Internal" section of our Physics dept website, I stumbled across Dan Watson's rather odd talk, "What are graduate schools looking for?" It's odd in two respects: First, he recommends a specific reading programme to prepare for the verbal GRE, and second, he gives a bizarre formula to evaluate your prospects for grad school admission. Giving a formula is not so completely weird, but allegedly this formula, a linear combination of the strengths of your various application materials with coefficients taken out to six significant figures, is recommended by the NSF.

(If the the thing is accurate, my conclusion is that I should definitely have retaken the Physics GRE or applied in computer science; substituting my CS GRE score for my Physics GRE score, my score on this thing goes from 3.6 to 1.7; in words, from "apply to a couple of the elite schools, five or six schools in the next tier, and a couple of safe schools" to "apply to all of the best graduate schools, and for fancy graduate fellowships like the NSF Fellowships. You don't have to worry about anything.")

I just received a letter of acceptance to the math department at University of Hawaii!

Hmm. That's actually kind of tempting.

For those who haven't heard, yes I accepted the offer from University of Rochester.

I've been in touch with all the other students who came to the recruiting weekend in February. Only two of them (excluding me) accepted the offer! We were worried that we'd be all alone, but it turns out that three other non-visiting domestic students and six foreign students accepted, for a total of twelve.

Here is the data pertaining to the incoming class:
Data Pertaining to the Incoming Class

Notice the huge class that we follow. Hopefully that won't be problematic.

I wish all depts would make these kind of charts and graphs available. (-: I'm not sure that they really intended to make this one public, though.

incoming students with web pages:
Jaewon Park
Teresa Negrini — "Jetzt auch mit Auto!"

I have been very unproductive lately. At work they are bugging me to finish this tomography software, but to do so I need a lot of microscope time. Pretty much the only option for that is to work the midnight to 08:00 shift, which I just might do. But only if they'll really love me for it.

In leui of actual work, I updated the project web pages jpegrescue and hoshenkopelman, the latter due to a back up of emails requesting various things.

I found another graduate school ranker. It's based on a survey distributed to current grad students.

It says I should go to Rochester. Just ranking over "overall satisfaction," Rochester comes in second, after UC Santa Cruz and tied with Cornell. UNC is lumped in the third quartile. CMU did not respond.

I suspect this survey has a huge amount of self-selective bias in it, though. We should all sign up to take part in next year's incarnation. (There were 32 responses for Rochester and 28 for UNC — far more than for most departments, so the results should be statistically significant. Rochester has 135 physics PhD students, and UNC has 64.)

But I liked UNC so much!

These are rather irrelevent now, since I've resolved to work at UCSD over the summer, and attend Rochester or UNC/Chapel Hill.

admit/reject letters )

March 19, 2004

Dear Mr. Fricke:

I regret to inform you that you have not been accepted for graduate study in Applied Science and Technology (AS&T) at UC Berkeley.

The Berkeley campus has a strict enrollment ceiling and, thus, each program is limited in the number of new students it may admit each year. The Admissions Committee has the difficult task of selecting students from a large pool of well-qualified applicants. This year, AS&T received a record number of applications, which made the decision-making process even more difficult. Unfortunately, the AS&T Admissions Committee was unable to recommend admission to many outstanding applicants.

I am sorry that we do not have a place for you this year and hope that you will be able to make other arrangements to achieve your goals.

Sincerely,

Nathan Cheung, Chair
Graduate Group in Applied Science and Technology

CMU

Mar. 20th, 2004 02:10 pm
It's pouring rain in Pittsburgh now, and I'm hiding in the library at CMU. I did get to go up to the thirty-sixth floor of the "Cathedral of Learning," an inexplicable gothic monolith dominating the city. They say it was featured in Batman, and it's easy to believe; the thing is 100% pure Gotham, but with charming "Nationality" classrooms on the first floor: The Polish Room, the Lithuanian Room, the Swedish Room, the German Room, the Early American Room, the Czeckloslovak Room...

Sigh. I'm waiting for some kind of spark when I meet a professor, and it's just not happening. I haven't been able to get excited really by anyone's work here. It might be a failure just as much of communication as anything else, their ability to make their projects sound exciting. But projects that I'd jump at for a summer term I'm a lot more hesitant to accept for dedicated pursuit over a term of six years. As much as anything, I want them to want me as I want their work to be interesting. One professor - one who I already liked the most - mentioned with interest, "You lived in Lund, right?" And I was thinking: "She actually read my application!"

There was one professor I went to because his work sounded pretty exciting, quantum chromodynamics and all that. And this guy was terrifying! He seemed like an ordinary guy, but we asked him about his past grad students. He said, "Well, I've had three.. but two of them left me." Small warning sign: can't retain grad students. Big warning sign: "I'm so glad he is gone. Gosh! He just wasn't talented enough, he wasn't worth my money, he wasn't worth my time... He didn't even speak English very well!" Egads! I nod while crossing him off my list. Quite literally. And then he turns out, moreover, to be a bit of an intellectual chauvanist: when the guy from MIT comes into the room, he stops talking to the other two of us. He asks the MIT guy to come back later for another meeting.

But then I met his one surviving grad student, who he described with admiration in his eyes as his "star". And this guy was really fabulous, eight times more energetic than the normal mortal and a little bit crazy to boot, in exactly the way I like. So I'd love to work with this grad student, but his advisor seemed like he ought to be avoided within a certain radius.

I have the occassional feeling that, although the Physics dept here and elsewhere admitted me, the professors are far more skeptical. It can't be entirely true (the admissions committee is composed of professors), but still I had one prof sort of skoff, "You mean your degree is not in Physics??" The experimental particle physicists are nice to me, but that's not what I want to do. I think I did impress a particular condensed matter experimentalist that I knew What Was Going On, and I was able to converse intelligently with a medium energy experimentalist.. but...

WHERE ARE THE LASERS???

Carnegie Mellon seems like a nice place, and Pittsburgh is an interesting city. If Rochester's physics department were here, I think I would accept without much hesitation. But otherwise I think I could only leave Berkeley with a heavy heart, and I don't think I could ditch the feeling that I left someplace wonderful for something substandard.

It's not that this is a bad place, it's just that I have extremely high expectations. I have half a mind to just accept and see what happens, and half a mind to just stay at Berkeley and take the graduate physics sequence through my own guerrilla initiative. From my job interviews at Aerospace and at UCSD/IGPP, I came away thrilled with the idea I'd be working for them. I haven't gotten that feeling here or at Rochester.

I also occassionally wonder whether Physics is really what I want to study. I always come to the conclusion that it is, because physics is hard and I want the challenge, because physics is at the core of anything else I'd be interested in, and because I have this idea that if you're going to study something, it ought to be physics. But in engineering / computer science, I can really hold my own. Concepts come very easy to me and engineering is nicely compatible with my intuition. In physics I don't feel quite so brilliant.

One of the prospective students — from Caltech — here also got into Chicago and Berkeley. One of the professors he was talking to here at CMU learned of this. The professor whispered to him, emphatically:``Go to Berkeley.''

Well, University of Hawaii lost my transcript. I sent it to them on December 31, and their deadline was March 1, so maybe my application was too early. They finally wrote to me asking if I had sent one.. I said I did.. they dug around awhile and said, "whoops, here it is! sorry for the trouble! we'll be sending you an offer soon!" I guess that's good. Too bad it's so late in the game.

Also, my friend at University of Maryland just wrote with this bit: ``Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I actually just spoke to Dr. Chant (the graduate chair). He said that they just submitted their acceptences. That does not mean that you will have gotten an answer in the mail yet, or that, if you haven't gotten an answer you weren't accepted. It just means that the wheels are starting to turn, so you should know soon. Keep me posted.

Just when I start to give up hope on getting into any of the remaining places, things start to get exciting again. I hope you've all got your fingers crossed for berkeley berkeley berkeley.

scoreboard )
I just applied to UMN and I am applying to "the" OSU, largely because (1) they are still accepting applications (!), and (2) they have no application fees.

I have to prepare a list of professors who I want to meet when I visit Carnegie Mellon next weekend. Here's my current list of professors whose work sounded especially cool for some reason:

(So many R- names! weird.) I was also irritated (by which I mean envious) to read that Prof. Jeff Peterson sends undergrads to the south pole on a regular basis.

Hmm. Anyway, you can look as well and tell me if I missed anybody particularly cool. There's a distinct lack of things having to do with LASERS on that list. Now that I look back on the list I'm not so sure. This whole grad school thing is much too complicated. I feel like I should have added some EE, CS, geophysics, and applied physics programs to the mix. I really hope I get into Berkeley.. anyway, the results should be in by the end of next week, I think.

I just bought a plane ticket to Durham, NC for my UNC Chapel Hill visit. Leaving Oakland on Thursday, April 1 on American Airlines flights 1182 and 1782, arriving 20:57. Returning Sunday, April 4 on AA flights 1171 and 1997, arriving 21:58.

First of all, is it some kind of public holiday today that nobody told me about? There's nobody here at work but me.. and this rep from Silicon Graphics who came to fix our sick computer.

It's a brilliant day in Berkeley.. bright blue sky, fresh air, sun, green grass, flowers on the trees, bustling with people. I don't know how I could leave this city. I spent the (5-day) weekend in Rochester visiting the university there... they have a great program, lots of nifty fancy quantum optics labs and giant lasers, and a quaint town with a river and a canal and neat little victorian houses with very cheap rent. But that city just lacks the pizzazz of this one. (I might still end up there... who knows.)

The flight home was long but pretty fun.. Chicago was closed for two hours, meaning we sat on the tarmac at Rochester for about that time. But we got there eventually, with time for some dinner (orange chicken!). Dana and I got to be buddies and got seats together on the Chicago to Oakland flight. It was a pretty good flight on a nice new Airbus plane. (I am kind of shocked that United Airlines bought a European aircraft... but I'm not complaining.)

Got a rejection letter from Princeton in the mail here at the lab today. (And a letter from Ohio State thanking me for my application... what application?) But all I'm waiting for now, I think, is the letter from Berkeley.

next stop Pittsburgh, 3/18.. no, next stop Chapel Hill, 3/11. The chapel hill recruiting weekend sounds very nice, including dinner at a professor's house, and hiking in the Duke woods.. but I'm missing the recruiting wknd and just going on my own. (update: looks like I'm going to Chapel Hill in April instead, 'cause my proposed date is during their spring break. oh well, maybe the weather will be nicer.)

P.S. I voted last week.

Rochester V

Mar. 1st, 2004 01:06 pm

I'm posting from the U of R library at the moment. Not too much going on. I came to campus today to check out what it's like with students present. I guess it's like universities everywhere.. I notice that there must be some standard fonts for signs in libraries, or something.

Looking at ads in the student union, it appears that rent for a room in an apartment or a house runs about $300 per month. wow! of course, there's apparently heating to be paid too. Then one of the ads listed "STRAIGHT MALE OR FEMALE ONLY" which I found pretty damn obnoxious.

There seems to be a rather heavy frat presense here.. everyone in the library seems really young (I guess they have fewer 6th year undergrads than berkeley..) and a lot are wearing their greek letters.

Still feeling all woozy with illness. I was going to try to do some homework on the plane, but I think I'll probably pass out immediately. That will be nice. Also, Chicago airport has Panda Express. Yummy orange chicken goodness.

BTW, when are these other grad schools going to email me? Columbia, Maryland, Brown, Princeton, Berkeley.. say something! I'm most eager to hear from Maryland and Brown since there's a chance I might go there, and the time for visiting is growing short.

Our lectures today started with an enumeration of the various prizes that Rochester physicists have been awarded. It was meant to be impressive, but to me it seemed almost like damning with faint praise. Afterwards, Mattias turned to me and asked, ``Have you heard of any of those prizes?"

Except for the two nobel prizes (one to Steve Chu, who did his B.S. in Math and Physics at U of R, and one to the japanese dude who started KamiokaNDE), I had never heard of them before.

We had lectures from professors in each of the major subfields at a turbo pace today. The talks all went over and there was little time to get a word in edgewise. In a sense it was silly, because I already know about the standard model in a qualitative way, and I was much more interested in mundane details: "Do grad students get desks?" (yes) "Is there a machine shop?" (yes, but there's only one machinist) "How long will it take to graduate?" (5-6 years) "Does anyone take advantage of the exchange program with Cornell?" ("I've never heard of it.") "Do the frosh live mostly on campus?" (90% of them do) I've been feeling quite sick, so of course my exuberance has been dampened by the desire to stay cozily drugged and unconscious in bed. For almost the entirety of yesterday and today we were inside the physics building, which is sort of a dull place. The talks were in the basement.

Finally we got a long-awaited campus tour, got to go outside and bound about. The other students snickered by the obvious amusement the two Californians found in the snow. The tour revealed the incredible smallness of the campus.. This is really a small school! The buildings are heated to tropical temperatures to compensate for the sub-freezing temperature outside. I don't understand this over-compensation. Californians are content to put on a pullover indoors, but denizens of arctic climates insist on heating their buildings to tank-top temperatures.

The laser lab is awesome, but I'm not all that sure what sort of work one would be doing there. It is, like CERN, primarily an Engineering effort, in terms of the domain of the bulk of the labor.

We had a brief tour of student housing. All the buildings are brick, and the student housing is good but not particularly charming in any way. There are, for example, nothing like co-ops.

In the evening we gathered one last time to schmooze with the profs. They are all very eager to convince us to come to Rochester, and several remembered bits from our applications ("you're the computer guy" or "and you've been running all over the globe"). But I wasn't really feeling up to too much more schmoozing, so I talked with Mattias for most of the time. (It's amazing how much gossip can develop from one summer in Geneva. We also swapped travel tales.. he's been through Africa, Uzbekistan, all over the place.)

In a sense I think all the propective students are looking at each other for an evaluation of Rochester. The first to decide may set a trend. I haven't reached a conclusion myself. I think the department here is good, but I suppose my visit here has given me a better idea of the realities of graduate school, and it's a little frightening. Although I would like a change of environment, my hopes are ever more on the UC Berkeley AST group, although I fear that that graduate group has too many bigwigs and too few young advisors with an interest in students (something that is not lacking here).

University of Rochester has the largest laser in the world, and by 'largest' they're referring primarily to it being the most powerful but it's got to be competitive on the basis of physical size as well. An initial infrared pulse propages through the laser medium, repeatedly amplified and split. By the end of the arrangement, 60 beams simultaneously converge on a 1 mm pellet of tritium and deuterium ice inside a small plastic bubble. The purpose is to induce thermonuclear fusion.

This is used to experimentally reproduce the conditions inside stars, bringing "laboratory astrophysics" from an oxymoron to a major area of research. The other big point is of course fusion for power production. Fusion produces enough energy to cover the cost required to electrolyze water into hydrogen and oxygen, and then to sort the hydrogen into its isotopes, and also to power the laser beams that ignite the fusion reaction. It's not too much of a stretch to say that you burn seawater to produce helium and oxygen and huge amounts of energy.

I think Buckminster Fuller would be proud. He was the canonical futurist, and insisted that technology could be used to provide for the needs of all people on earth. Strictly speaking, fusion is not a renewable energy source; at first glance, burning water (a precious substance necessary for life) seems full of folly. But as 1 km^3 of water contains as much energy as all the known oil in the world, it doesn't seem there's much cause for worry. Fusion seems to be the only 'clean' energy source, although one might do well to not prognosticate with excessive optimism — nuclear fission was promised to produce energy 'too cheap to meter,' but instead it has been one of the most costly endeavors ever undertaken.

But it seems Fusion would be clean, and, suprisingly, at center of it (in a quite literal way), is technology invented and championed by Buckminster Fuller. It's necessary to implode the fusion fuel with utmost uniformity, blasting it evenly from as many angles as possible. It turns out that the geometric arrangements permitting this are exactly the configurations we know as 'geodesic domes,' with the beams entering from each vertex.

It gets better. The tritium-deuterium fuel must be held in place during the experimental set-up. Unfortunately almost any material will become excessively brittle at the super-cold temperatures required, approximately 18 Kelvin. But a substance has been found, and it's used to fix the fusion fuel into position at the center of this 60-vertex buckyball: the silk from a spider.

One of the lab directions jokingly cites this as evidence that Darwin was wrong. "Why would a Spider need silk that would function on Pluto?"

Uuurgh. Flights to the east coast are so hard. The waking up early, the inability to sleep on the airplanes, the rarified atmosphere.. I get sick everytime. And so here I am in some hotel cool enough to offer free DSL with a fever and chills... When I came to Boston the same thing happened.. I powered through it with regular dosages of my Israeli non-Aspirin fever reducers. I suppose I'll inquire with the front desk about their pharmaceutical supplies..

Other than that the trip has been good so far. Left home 06:02 on the BayPorter, got to Oakland 06:45, vegetated in the terminal for two hours. I ended up chatting with this guy who was on my flight for most of the time. He introduced himself as being from Wind River Systems, and he was shocked that I'd heard of the company. By the end of our conversation I felt like I could successfully ask him for a job. After the technical subjects our conversation turned to politics (he's another recovering Deaniac). Turns out he lives with his 'partner' Ted in manchester and he was adamant about wanting to get married, "none of this civil unions nonsense."

It was nice of University of Rochester to have the Syracuse Varsity Cheerleading Squad meet me at the gate in Rochester. (I also like how U of R noted specially that this hotel they're putting us up in has a heated indoor pool) Outside of security I found my uncle Pat and my grandfather waiting for me, and we went out for a big meal at an italian restaurant (fetuccini alfredo, red wine, tirimisu, cappuccino, mmm). By the end I was very eager to collapse in a nice comfy bed at the hotel.

It would be fun to go meet the other prospective grad students (hence 'pros') but I'm not really feeling up to it at the moment. We had good times when NEU put us up in the Collonnade Hotel in Boston.. five-oclock cocktails, bicycling around MIT with Kenny, playing in the Christian Scientists' fountain. Instead I will commence my search for ibuprofin.

I like this. Every day, like clockwork, at 11:48 AM, I receive a letter like the following. Hopefully this will continue. (-: YAY, FREE TRIP TO PITTSBURGH!! Now, if only these schools didn't schedule their visiting days for the same weekend. I have to admit that one of the reasons for me applying to CMU was because I wanted to visit Brandon there. (-:

Read more... )

UNC

Feb. 10th, 2004 11:21 am

Well, it looks like I was admitted to UNC. I don't think there's much chance I'll accept their offer, but I am curious to visit. I do feel that it doesn't bode so well that I was offered just a TA-ship by UNC of all places. That and their theory group seems to consist of just one professor, and the theory grad student I wrote to at UNC misspelled 'Berkeley' in her reply. I also like how Rochester is making all my travel arrangements for me. (-:

Here's what one of my friends says about UNC. He graduated EECS from here, then did a Masters at UNC, now works at IBM:

Hey Tobin. UNC's campus is pretty nice. A real Eastern campus with lots of green and brick. The town is sleepier and less culturally diverse than UC Berkeley, of course. I don't know anything about their Physics department though. But I'm sure if you were going to go there you would've done your research anyway. Buses throughout Chapel Hill and Carrboro are free.

offer letter follows )

Looks like it's admissions decision season...

From: UNC Admissions Committee

The admissions committee has read through your file and they find it very interesting. However, they would like to see a letter of recommendation from one of your professors at UC-Berkeley. We are going to start sending offer letters very soon, so the sooner one of your professors can write to us, the better. Anything we receive after Friday of next week will not be very helpful. The letter can be e-mailed to me.

Hmm... `very interesting'. Almost sounds like, "You are a curious specimen. We wish to know more." Anyway, tricky tricky.. none of my recommendations are from Berkeley.. hmm.. now to find some Berkeley prof who can write something nice about me and do it on short notice. Hmm.

I also got a phone call from Arizona State University's Dept of Physics and Astronomy.. asking me to submit an application.

Tobin Fricke: Congratulations on your admission to the Department of Physics and Astronomy's Ph.D. program at the University of Rochester. We would like to invite you to our recruiting weekend on February 27 and 28 at our expense. The program starts around noon on Friday and departure is Sunday morning.

I applied specifically to a program at the Laboratory for Laser Energetics.

Edits: 1- It's worth noting that U of R is ranked second in the U.S. for "graduate student happiness" or something like that. 2- this was excellent return on investment; there's no application fee to U of R! 3- here's a question for you who have done this before (or who haven't, but are imaginative): what should I ask / look for on these visitations?

Now, only eight more schools to hear from. (-:

March 2020

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Style Credit

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Page generated Sep. 11th, 2025 10:25 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags