RG&E Nuclear
Aug. 29th, 2006 03:51 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Until I stumbled across it while bumbling along back roads, through apple orchards, I didn't know that Rochester has a nuclear power plant (aerial photo). Everyone knows about the power stations at Oswego (whose huge cooling tower can't be missed), something like 50 miles from here, but I'd never heard of this one.
Could a nuclear reactor provide its hot cooling water (which is otherwise just dumped to Lake Ontario) to the city for heating—is nuclear cogeneration done anywhere? Or at least we could create a tropical bio-dome adjacent to the reactor. (I always thought that staunchly anti-nuclear Berkeley could easily be won over if the reactor supplied hot water to all the city's hot tubs.)
Could a nuclear reactor provide its hot cooling water (which is otherwise just dumped to Lake Ontario) to the city for heating—is nuclear cogeneration done anywhere? Or at least we could create a tropical bio-dome adjacent to the reactor. (I always thought that staunchly anti-nuclear Berkeley could easily be won over if the reactor supplied hot water to all the city's hot tubs.)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 08:15 pm (UTC)Good points you make - come to think of it, what is the Ginna plant used for? I have NYMO out where I am - they use out of state hydro and biomass sources to enhance their supply. I wonder if RG&E has any dealings with Ginna.
This might be satire.
Date: 2006-08-29 09:21 pm (UTC)But you'd be piping around contaminated water! Any water that goes into that plant becomes immediately tainted! Who wants a hot-tub that glows green and results in everyone growing an extra leg?!
Nuclear is intrinsically evil and dangerous. We should stick to clean power with no detrimental side effects, like solar, hydro, and wind!!~
DIY Hot Tubs, Danny, Sea Mamals, Zeno's Paradox and Tax Code.
Date: 2006-08-29 11:08 pm (UTC)I read this bit about how income paid to you to cover your taxes is taxable itself, and I thought of you cause of the end bit:
"For example, assume an employer wants to pay a salary yielding $30,000 in after-tax incom to an employee who is taxable at a 28% tax-inclusion rate. Applying the 28% to the $30,000 of income produces $8,400 of tax, which in turn (at a 28% rate) would produce $2,352 of tax, $659 of tax, $184 of tax, $52 of tax, $15 of tax, $4 of tax, $1 of tax and some additional pennies for a total of $11,667 (These numbers are rounded to the nearest dollar. Those who insist on mathematical precision and are concerned with Zeno's paradox should look at [Internal Revenue Code Section] 7504)."
Tobo, I love the last parenthetical bit; some tax nerd snerkingly required the Internal Revenue Code deal with Zeno's paradox. That's friggin beautiful.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-01 01:14 am (UTC)