I've been following the legal LGBT marriage arguments for so long I automatically slipped into legalese. I figured that (1) since marriage is a legal status, (2) Anne could easily be a total lesbo and married to a lesbo, and (3) since the validity of marriages is up in the air at present (among the states/federal government), that without knowing the specifics of Anne's marriage I couldn't really answer the question.
Like for my chums C&H, we all think they're married, but the state & fed gov't won't recognize this unholy matrimony. Then there's T&K, who CA believes are married, but most of the other states won't recognize their marriage when they drive/fly through, nor will the federal gov't.
So I figured it cannot be determined without figuring out whether marriage was an "either/or" thing, rather than "it depends on where you are and who you ask" thing.
But yeah. I can totally see that the answer otherwise would be yes, if marriage was an 'either/or' thing.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
i don't get it either.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I'm either the best lawyer, or the worst.
Like for my chums C&H, we all think they're married, but the state & fed gov't won't recognize this unholy matrimony. Then there's T&K, who CA believes are married, but most of the other states won't recognize their marriage when they drive/fly through, nor will the federal gov't.
So I figured it cannot be determined without figuring out whether marriage was an "either/or" thing, rather than "it depends on where you are and who you ask" thing.
But yeah. I can totally see that the answer otherwise would be yes, if marriage was an 'either/or' thing.
Re: I'm either the best lawyer, or the worst.