nibot ([personal profile] nibot) wrote2006-07-14 02:55 pm
Entry tags:

random.bml

In a (usually futile) effort to break out of the usual LJ-clique and find new and interesting content*, I have a toolbar button that takes me to a "random livejournal" (http://www.livejournal.com/random.bml).

It just took me to [livejournal.com profile] frinkle_twinkle, whose current (from September) entry is all about how it seems she gets a disproportionate number of visitors via the random journal selector: http://frinkle-twinkle.livejournal.com/

Is the random-livejournal selector broken, or is this just observational bias? (Anyone could notice some random visitors, put up a note about them, and then suddenly have lots of people saying that they, too, got there via the random journal button, and isn't that funny.) I suppose the way to test this, aside from inspecting the source code to random.bml, would be to make a new journal with a post that says "Isn't it funny, so many people seem to be getting here via the random button" post, and see how many "me too" comments accrue.

* actually, just to waste time.

[identity profile] codetoad.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, that might be it. A lot of journals I'm seeing in random.bml haven't been updated in the past few days..

[identity profile] nibot.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Many of them, in fact, have been deleted.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] nibot.livejournal.com 2006-07-19 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)
It's definitely stuck. Many of the journals that show up via random_bml have comments on their entries about how the reader got there via random_bml.

most recently http://shebbybaby.livejournal.com/60884.html